Personal Reflection

Sunday, April 19, 2009

To be frank, when I was first told about this project, I thought it was going to be tedious and dull. However, this whole experience has almost been, dare I say, enjoyable. It makes it so much easier to be involved in a project where your focal point is interesting to you.

This assignment has further taught me how to really dig; for information, themes, ideas, character analysis. Critical thinking and a deeper level of understanding is necessary, and I would like to think that I have improved in these areas. I wouldn’t so much say I have improved as a reader, but as a gatherer. Learning to pick out key bits of information has become a great skill to have. My major improvement would be my writing skills. I have further learned how to express my opinion and with a higher degree of thinking.

Having a wider audience influenced in my writing in a sense that I could be more creative with my style, but at the same time making sure that it could be comprehendible. It meant I had to speak with a certain level of receptiveness and clarity.

Unfortunately I had a certain impression of Canadian literature; that it was not what I would normally consider “a good read”. Having read Spanish Fly, that misconception has changed. Authors of this country have just as good of credentials and strength as writers as Americans or anyone.

Through my reading, I have come to understand human struggle and the issue of establishing personal identity. Finding your own voice is not easy. With strong influences like Virgil in the novel, or in our own lives’, one can be lead astray into thinking or acting upon something they do not believe in. It taught me that you really need to trust your own instincts, and not be afraid to listen.

In summary, this ISU has shown me how to appreciate a work of literature, and to really value Canadian works. I have learned how to express myself and how I can effectively show my creativity. Most importantly, Spanish Fly has taught me the meaning of following a dream or an instinct no matter how little or big. You have to follow what draws you, despite the destination.

Works Cited

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

CBC Radio. Words at Large: Will Ferguson Interview. 13 Dec 2007. 9 April 2009
<http://www.cbc.ca/wordsatlarge/blog/2007/12/will_ferguson_interview.html>.

Ferguson, Will. "Spanish Fly". Toronto: Penguin Group. 2007.

Ferguson, Will. Will Ferguson's Biography. 2009. 9 April 2009
<http://www.willferguson.ca/bio.html>.

Ferguson, Will. Reviews of Spanish Fly. 2009. 9 April 2009
<http://www.willferguson.ca/reviews/index.html>.

Hunt, Stephen. "Write What You Know - Will Ferguson Knows Cons". Winnipeg Free Press. 23
Sept 2009. 7 April 2009.
-ca&site=pov-can>.

Kubik, Jeff. "Review of Spanish Fly". Alberta Views. April 2008. 9 April 2008
<http://web.ebscohost.com/pov/pdf?vid=3&hid=101&sid=ee0a1d90-6391-4a69-80f7>.

Paglierani, Stephen. What Makes Really Good Writing Good?. 2009. 9 April 2009
<http://ezinearticles.com/?What-Makes-Really-Good-Writing-Good?&id=514208>.

Explication

Explication of a Daring Enterprise in "Spanish Fly" by Will Ferguson

Will Ferguson’s novel Spanish Fly is greatly based on George Polti’s ninth model of creating a dramatic situation based around a daring enterprise, involving a bold leader, an adversary, and an object. Ferguson weaves a clever and humorous tale which provides a hard look at the American Dream. The protagonist Jack McGreary is swept along by two swindlers by the names of Virgil Ray and Miss Rose. Within the novel, the bold leader is portrayed by Virgil Ray and the adversary is portrayed by Jack. The object is identified as the thrill of the con and at times, Miss Rose as the object of affection. What I found interesting is that the roles of the bold leader and adversary reverse between Jack and Virgil as the climax is presented within the novel.

To begin with, Virgil Ray is the novel’s initial bold leader involving him and his two partners in adventurous expeditions. Leading Miss Rose and Jack McGreary all over the American Midwest, he would have them “work [their] way up one route and down the other, prowling through – and preying upon – each community [they] entered, big or small” (Ferguson 133). Virgil is a brash and brazen character, not afraid to tell it like it is, or act on a will. Although a bit rough around the edges, Virgil has a code to his cons that he abides by. When he is speaking to Jack he is telling him that his cons are “not stealing when they give [their money] to you. Remember that. You outsmarted them, is all. Won that money, plain and simple. It don’t count as stealing” (Ferguson 133). He believes in what he is doing as “all of us are on the take, telling lies. I’m just more honest about it” (Ferguson 181), and with every obstacle that the three encounter, he sticks to his guns and follows through. As well, Virgil plans all the cons that the three pull on the gullible. As the story progresses, Virgil takes more and more risks of getting caught by gradually moving the scale of his cons upward.

The novel’s adversary would initially and unexpectedly be the protagonist Jack McGreary. Throughout the story, Virgil teaches and mentors Jack, “soaking it all up, the repertoire of cons Virgil had at his fingertips” (Ferguson 140), as his apprentice so that he can accompany him alongside his cons and to “try tossing the tat” (Ferguson 192). Virgil sees the potential in Jack to be great, commending to Jack that “You’ve got a good eye kid” (Ferguson 176). Jack is a daring young man who begins to believe that the three of them “stir up the sediment and rouse their hidden desires” (Ferguson 181). As Virgil’s adversary, Jack changes who he is on a dime as his identity for the con “depended on what the game required” (Ferguson 244).

It is in my opinion that there are two objects in this story. One of them is the thrill of the con that all three of the main characters seek. As an example, Virgil is a man wishing to fulfill the American dream, envisioning of building “an entire city designed solely for the artful extraction of dollars from dupes” (Ferguson 179). It is a con man’s dream, but a dream nonetheless. Virgil considers each of them as “aristocrats of the criminal set” (Ferguson 137) and pulls his cons because you “gotta earn your keep” (Ferguson 127). Another object subtly present is Miss Rose, the object of Jack’s affection. Although Virgil and Miss Rose seem to be involved with each other, there is no doubt that there is sexual tension between Jack and Miss Rose. At times “Rose squeezed past [Jack] so close, [he] could smell the softness of Camay rising from her” (Ferguson 245). The shared apartment also meant that Jack could be caught “stealing glances at Miss Rose in her undergarments” (Ferguson 179). Although the two never acted on their wishes, the intensity between them was always present.

At the climax of the story, interestingly enough, the roles of bold leader and adversary reverse between Jack and Virgil. Unfortunately, Virgil is in a tight spot, his freedom at stake, and is forced to rely on Jack and puts his faith in him saying “you’ll be fine. I’d bet on you any day” (Ferguson 353) to take the reins and pull one of the biggest cons of all their careers in order to save Virgil and his true identity.

With considerable strength, Ferguson’s Spanish Fly demonstrates the ninth of Polti’s thirty six dramatic situations to create a daring enterprise, and a wonderfully written novel. Through the incredible complexity of the characters, the daring enterprise of cons thrills the reader and creates a world where the bad guy isn’t necessarily all bad, and speaks volumes for the novel’s greatness.

Apologia

Great literature is in the eye of the beholder. Everyone has their own definition of great and their own interpretation for what makes good writing. It is in my opinion that a body of work that can relate to people is worthy of being deemed good literature. Spanish Fly by Will Ferguson demonstrates human struggle, passions, ideals, and beliefs. The story relates so well to humanities issues and brings to the foreground unforgettable plots, characters, and themes. The history and research also spent into writing this novel is extraordinary and kept me entertained as the reader right from the beginning.

Although Will Ferguson is a world traveller “spending 5 years in Japan and living for a while in South America" ("Ferguson's Biography"), his roots are deeply Canadian “as he has lived cross country, from Prince Edward Island to Calgary, to everywhere in between” ("Ferguson's Biography"). Perhaps his somewhat nomadic lifestyle has allowed him to realize the importance of indulging in one’s own culture but also drawing on experiences and resources learned and gathered elsewhere. As Ferguson commented on CBC’s “Word at Large” Radio Interview Show, “[Travelling] has influenced my travel memoirs. In travel memoirs you need to evoke place and time, you use dialogue to reveal character, you rely on vignettes and the telling detail. Just like fiction” ("Words at Large"). His travels and lifestyle are represented well in his writing. The multiculturalism and unique diversity allows him to bring more to the table and could be one of the main attributes for the strength of his writing (Hunt).

What I believe makes this novel such an amazing and captivating piece of writing is Ferguson’s ability to create such fascinating and intriguing characters. As Ferguson commented on CBC Radio, it’s “the sheer, brazen confidence that they embody. They are self-invented, charming, brash and utterly unhindered by such restrictions as class, income, social position or a conscience” ("Words at Large"). I also find it interesting how as the reader I fell in love with the anti-hero. Ferguson comments “It's always the bad guys that fascinate us, isn't it? Not the noble hero, strong of jaw and pure of heart. It's the rascals that we find compelling” ("Words At Large"). Their personalities set the stage for an amazing plot line. Jack McGreary, the novel’s protagonist surprised me at the oddest of moments. At times I believed him to be this quiet, intrapersonal character, and then the next he will be daring and brute. He is simply an endearing character and is such a relatable character, pondering the ideas of morals and ethics. At the same time however, Jack is complex. Ferguson subtly drops hints and cleverly has the ability of “keeping his cards close to his chest”("Reviews of Spanish Fly"). His development of the plot through the little tid bits of information that revealed Jack’s true nature had me guessing as the reader to the very end. I would also wish to note that the complexity and strength of the research put in by Ferguson allows the reader to really understand the cons and the unfolding plot.

Furthermore, Ferguson undoubtedly delivers a great theme in Spanish Fly. For someone as big-hearted as Jack, he learns from his partners in crime that “it’s impossible to trust anyone in a world where you shouldn’t believe your eyes” (Kubik), in reference to the cons they pull. On one hand, the characters see the thrill of a well-orchestrated con, but on the other, Jack is troubled and empathizes with his “marks” as they say. The theme relates so well to the human condition and the fact that we all face moral dilemmas. Each of us can understand the torment it causes Jack through out the novel, but also applaud Jack for his strength of character and his ability to walk away from a life of crime to carve his own.

In closing, Spanish Fly is a remarkable work of Canadian literature. Ferguson digs deep into history and knowledge of the cons and characters. Rooted in the story, Ferguson timelessly embeds the morality and ethics of the human heart and its soul. It’s no trick or swindle that Will Ferguson has created such an amazing piece of good Canadian literature.

Fourth Reading Response

The Climax has arrived everyone!

In part 3 known as "Jack's Wager", the three musketeers of crime discover they can only go so long without getting caught. Virgil, the co-brain of the operations at this point, is the "mark" and is being framed by a group of swindlers, identities unknown, who will reveal his real name of Giuseppe Balsamo to the authorities to have him put away in jail if not paid "$50 000. Fortunately for Jack, Virgil and Rose give him an opportunity to escape and leave, a chance to leave unscathed. However, he doesn't take the bait. He decides for the two's sake, to stay with them for the long haul.

Avoiding beat-downs, scary one-on-one encounters, the "almost mob", Jack's true colours begin to emerge and he reveals a sinister, conniving counterpart to the once innocent Jack McGreary. With Virgil involved in the biggest scam of his career, Jack pulls off his own to save his partner's hide. It amazes me how incredibly quick-thinking he is. I have never come across a character that is quite as intelligent as Jack. He may not use it for the best of reasons, but boy does he know how to apply every, single thing he has learned in the past few months from Rose and Virgil. Quick-thinking, intelligence, lying, and although he would admit it, luck helped him and his pose out of a near-death situation.

The final few chapters in the novel are when I notice the greatest changes in Jack as a character. He sheds the blue collar for a pair of expensive Italian leathers. He may not be high class, but he is no simpleton anymore. A factory worker who couldn't get the girl or grades transforming like a butterfly into a crafted or crafty, which ever you prefer, con artist with an uncanny ability to see beyond the scope of a simple con. He has a realm of worldly experience, one that he would never had received in Paradise Flats. His way of thinking and perceiving others, judging first and getting to know later is now rule of thumb.

That's why I was so surprised when Jack didn't decide to accompany Virgil and Rose after he saved them from the framed swindle. Instead he took a suitcase to the train station to head home, send his poor father the money he had been saving through his cons to pay for living expenses and then head North to Canada to sign up for the emerging War overseas. I always suspected he wouldn't fully change his ways, but I didn't expect him to leave them and go to War. I never imagined him in that light. He is incredibly smart, I was taken aback in his decision. Maybe because I have foresight into the War and I could predict that accompanying the two would bring a longer and hopefully more prosperous life than a life at War.

I was however pleased and impressed at the very end. Jack stayed true to his con. He tricked his partner Virgil into the "suitcase switch", tricking Virgil into taking his suitcase full of clothing, and Jack taking off with all their hard earnings. All Virgil could say was "That kid just stole all our money" and Rose replying "He didn't steal it. You gave it to him". A true revolution of role identity. Virgil outsmarted and made to be the halfwit by his Great apprentice Jack. Grasshopper finally jumped higher then the master.

Third Reading Response

As almost any novel does, the plot has begun to thicken. Like a Zen master and young grasshopper, Jack and Virgil are student and teacher with Rose closely behind, tying the boys' loose ends. Travelling and pulling heists on the low-lives and big bangers of Silver City have brought a new and different wealth of knowlege to Jack. Unlike school where you learn the three R's, Jack has learned how to read people, look for "tells", and most importantly, to think, react, and con on your feet. However, the roles of student and teacher are slowly and surely becoming of equal weight.

He may not say, but Jack is a young man with the gears turning upstairs. He's a thinker, constantly inquisitive, and progressive as I have begun to notice. Although he values Virgil as a mentor and teacher, a new conflict has arisen. Jack can't help but see the ripped seams and loop holes in Virgil's fully-baked schemes. Virgil has in no doubt thought long and hard about his plans, but Jack, an extremely gifted apprentice, sees undiscovered potential lying in Virgil's plans. He even proposes an idea to start their own "company" of selling Spanish Fly, an aphrodizac to the "intimately challenged" as Virgil puts it. However, SpanishFly is very expensive and dangerous for human consumption, so following the con man way, Jack suggests selling and marketing it as a placebo, progressive no? Nonetheless, other proposed changes by Jack sends Virgil aback. I believe the conflict lies with Virgil. A confident man, Virgil does not like to be proven wrong. He sees Jack progressing far quicker than he thought possible. Although not very outspoken about it, Virgil shows insecurity and possibly fear. The grasshopper is catching up on the Zen master, nearly surpassing him and reversing the roles of student and teacher.

Whoever said women and men can't just be friends was right in the case of Rose and Jack. Rose, not quite partner in crime, but not sidekick, is without a doubt Virgil's loving partner. The connection between the two can often be loving and affectionate, but is more often distant and sarcastic. This may be because Jack is ever-present, but I am not quite convinced the two have a genuine loving relationship. Unfortunately for Virgil, there seems to be a growing intimate tension growing between Miss Rose and Jack. Little giveaways of the tension would be an "accidental" slipping of the robe, long stares, quiet "tells" of flirting; playing of the hair. The moments when Virgil is somewhat neglecting to Rose's needs, is when Jack steps up to be a stand up gentleman. The conflict forming is the secretive nature of the two's relationship. When Virgil isn't around, Jack and Rose share private moments of an intimate nature. Playing with poor Jack, an almost love-sick puppy, Rose plays it coy and mysterious with her feelings towards Jack. She remains loving to Virgil, but loyal for how long?

Second Reading Response

Monday, March 2, 2009

At the half way point in "Spanish Fly", Jack is faced with a flurry of conflicts which cause him to re-evaluate his way of living. While wandering the deserted streets of his home town Paradise Flats, Jack becomes engaged in the swindling act of a traveller and his lady partner in crime who happen to be passing through town. The man recognizes and sees the potential within Jack to become a great con man. A dilemma that Jack must deal with is whether he should accompany the two con artists who he knows nearly nothing about. Should he decide to live a life always looking over his shoulder, questioning his every move? Or should he stay behind in his home of Paradise Flats living by a never-changing daily routine?

As I read this, I began to contemplate what I would decide. Would I separate from my family and leave everything I know that's comfortable and familiar behind? or venture out into another part of the world and begin anew? I suppose I'm making that decision now. I'm wanting to leave Stratford and leave everything and everyone that I have kept close to my heart to attend university. If I were in Jack's position I would do the same thing. Jack has already begun to tour around the state and surrounding states to swindle the gullible and the naive with the two con artists by the name of Rose and Virgil. I'm not sure if I could stay in one place for my entire life. I see myself in a similar light to Jack in the sense that we both want something bigger and better, always wanting something new and exciting, constantly looking for the next big challenge. Jack has lived is whole life seeking something better. Finding peace in the library and escaping to new worlds and discovering new concepts and ideas within the pages of leather bound books has brought a sense of temptation to his life. . These two strangers are handing Jack a ticket to a brand new experience, one that he never thought imaginable.

As well, there's always the moral dilemma that Jack has been dealing with. He's questioning the ethics and morality of tricking and conning people and taking advantage of their trust. Virgil and Rose keep reminding him that "if the marks are willing to hand their money to you, they deserve to be taken". Jack isn't quite convinced. All his life he has grown up in a blue-collar community. Everyone knows everyone, and everyone's business. There has always been a sense of fellowship and trust among his neighbours. The company that he has taken are showing him how to throw his morals and values away and to pick up new ones, immoral ones. It's an inner struggle for Jack to figure out how to change his ways so that his conscience isn't so restless when he lays down to sleep.